|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeApparelRothco G.I Fingerless Wool Gloves |
|
|  |
| | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review: ( 18 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 11 found the following review helpful:
fingerless gloves Feb 26, 2008
By Eric's Girl
"lovesmoviesandbooks"
These gloves are really cool. I got them to be able to type even when I am in a cold room. They give me the flexibility i need to type while keeping my hands warm, which suits the purpose. the only drawback was that they don't fit me that well. Since these come from a miltary surplus place, I can only assume when they said one size fits all, they meant all soldiers. since my hands are small, they kind of bunch up and get in the way when I am typing. But it's one of those things that didn't bother me once i got used to it. All in all, these gloves rock (and they look cool, too).
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
 Frayed Sep 30, 2008
By Dustin Morris
I enjoy having the fingers available in the glove, but the quality is not the best. after about 3 wears strings started to unfray on the gloves. they got the job done, for the price its not really a big issue. if you are looking for a long lasting glove this isnt it. spend a little more to get a better quality product.
4 of 4 found the following review helpful:
Great value for the price Feb 17, 2010
By Cowboy fan
I recently purchased two different pairs of fingerless gloves. I purchased these Army gloves because they were very inexpensive (3 pair at $3.70 each + 5.65 total shipping). I also purchased more expensive Fox River fingerless gloves. I gave the Fox River glove 5 stars and this glove 4 stars for the following reasons.
1. Quality, this glove had loose threads coming out of the finger holes that needed to be cut off. There were also loose threads on the wrist hem. The three pair I purchased had similar quality.
2. Material, this glove contains more nylon (30% vs. 15%) and is probably made from rougher wool. It feels rougher and scratchier than the Fox River glove, but not enough to bother me and IT KEEPS MY HAND WARM! The pair I have been wearing seems to have softened with wear.
3. Appearance, this glove appears exactly as shown in the Amazon listing. It is stamped on one side with identifying codes in white letters. When you wear them, one will face your palm and the other will face the back of your hand. This is probably unfair, because I am criticizing an Army glove for looking like an Army glove.
I bought these gloves to keep my hands warm and they do! If you want a fingerless Army glove, buy these. For the price I paid, I would probably buy them again, but I prefer the Fox River glove for quality, feel, and appearance. These are great gloves for the price.
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
Too big for women. Oct 08, 2010
By Marley
They are definitely mens' gloves, although I could wear them (5'6" 130 lb) but prefer when gloves actually fit. They are a bit scratchy. I will give it to my husband.
I thought I will like the white print but the letters are impossible to read and it just doesn't make any sense, it looks like dirt.
Good concept but it needs improvement, at least more sizing (one for men one for women). The plus is that they're warm.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
 Fingerless Glove Feb 08, 2010
By Wise Shopper
My husband loves these gloves. They were a little stiff and scratchy when they arrived, but softened considerably when washed.
See all 18 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
